Workshop Reflection

Our workshop went well. Our workshop was fine.  It wasn’t great or fantastic, but we got through it. It certainly went well enough, it was not a complete disaster, but it was not my best work.

On March 30, my partner and I presented an hour long workshop on Kolb’s model of experiential learning (Kolb 1984). We began be having students write what experiential learning (EL)meant to them on the chalkboard.  Although they seemed to grasp the definition, my partner and I eagerly awaited to tell them more about the application of a science-based model for using EL.

Without reiterating the full lesson plan, I will provide my thoughts on each section:

1.     Group Activity Part 1: Developing Kolb’s Model - This activity went well, but it would have gone better had we known the four steps to giving good instructions.

2.     Background to Kolb’s Model - This portion was long winded and I wish we had gone with a reading in the wait time prior to the workshop.

3.     Kolb’s Model: the parts and debriefing - I’m not sure how clear this section was and I am concerned that I confused a few people with my word choice and citing the Healey and Jenkins (2007) paper. I think the most successful piece to this section was when I asked questions of the audience trying to engage them in each step of Kolb’s model.

4.     Group Activity Part 2: Applying Kolb’s Model - I think the haikus were the most successful part of this section.  If forced students to think and be creative which can sometimes be forgotten.  Below is an example of a model and haiku.

5.     Examples of EL - My partner and I clearly had different presentation styles (words vs. pictures).  I’m still trying to decide if this section was necessary, but I wanted to get people think about types of EL under a broad definition.

6.     Think-Pair-Share Discussion - This was a very useful time in the workshop.  I wish there had been more time here. I also wonder if there is a trick to cutting off long-winded responses.

7.     Resources PowerPoint - Perhaps I moved through this material a little too fast in the interest in time.  This could have been a great time for audience input.

8.     Handout and Survey - Not much to say here other than I think our handout will be very helpful our workshop participants in their future.

Our survey results indicated that participants learned something, are likely to use EL in their future courses, and were relatively satisfied with the quantity and quality of the materials covered.  Our most common feedback regarded the pace at which we covered materials. I agree that an improvement could be made here. Responses to "what is EL" were similar to responses given on the blackboard, but many responses included buzzwords from Kolb's model.

Overall, the time flew by fast.  I felt as if I was constantly looking at the clock to make sure we did not go over a reasonable time limit. However, we may have suffered quality for quantity of material because of this. Also, the time flew by and I don’t actually remember much of what happened; I wish I had remembered to have out workshop videotaped.  My biggest takeaways for the day were 1) letting my partner do his part without stepping on his toes and 2) allow more time for group activities and discussion.  Since this workshop, I have been approached about adapting the material for those who could not attend from another Penn State campus.  Hopefully I will have the opportunity to give the workshop another try and implement some changes.

I whole-heartedly believe in Kolb’s model and experiencing EL while teaching EL is a pretty good way to practice what I preach!

Mirco-teaching Reflection

I do not know why I was nervous going into this micro-teach.  I had already given this lesson plan once (the first day of FOR242) and had made some changes to adapt to a ten-minute time frame. Although I think the overall experience went smoothly, I was flustered by issues with technology that caused me to change my plan at the last second. This caused my students to potentially struggle with one of my objectives as I glazed over it.

The feedback was the most helpful component of the micro-teach. My harshest critic was the only person who gave me consistent opportunities for improvement, which I know not to take too personally, but give me more to think about as I continue developing lessons. For example, even though I think I am being engaging, I may actually be intimidating.

What I learned from my peers in micro-teaching is the variety of ways to incorporate activities and that the term “activity” takes on many meanings.  Some people view discussion as activity whereas others have to actually be moving around or using additional materials.  Although I thought I had an activity, others did not.  Oddly, the individual who thought I did not have an activity had a similar activity to mine.  It was also interesting to see how 10 minutes lasted an eternity for some individuals while 10 minutes was too short for others.

I am awkwardly looking forward to seeing my video recording of my micro-teach.  I believe this will help me the most in improving my teaching. I also wish I had had more than four students to teach to. It was unclear, although I did not ask, how many students to prepare for.  Also, 4 reviews of my performance did not seem to be enough. However, it may be useful to continue micro-teaching opportunities to try new strategies and activities so that I may have a practice run before a high stakes situation.

I would like to work on reflecting after my weekly teaching.  I have an hour and fifteen minute commute home which is plenty of time to reflect.  Perhaps I will try getting a voice recorder or finding an app so that I can capture my thoughts aloud as I drive home. I am not brave enough to try periscope and too uncoordinated for a video on my phone.  Also, taking notes on my lesson plans will help me remember changes I want to make in the future.  If I can do the leg work now, it will make preparing next year that much easier.

Lesson Plan: A Critical Review

The lesson plan I created for the first day of FOR242 is true to what occurred in the classroom on Thursday, January 14, 2016. I will admit, although I had thought through the class several times, I had only written a brief list of how I wanted class to go. Since writing this lesson plan, I have written the subsequent lesson plans to date and will continue to do so. Also true to the class, the session is 160 minutes instead of the typical 50 minutes. Therefore, I feel it is particularly important to change approaches several times in order to keep both my own and my student’s attentions.

Here are my thoughts as I developed the following:

Lesson Title (Phrased as a question)/ Learning Objectives/lesson goals
Creating a lesson title seems simple enough, but phrasing it as a question threw me for a loop. Frankly, I could not find a satisfactory answer online as to why a lesson title should be phrased as a question. The students won’t see it and likely few to no other faculty will see it either; so, I find myself asking how important is this?

Now that I know how to write a clear objective, it is very helpful to explicitly state these at the beginning of a lesson. I am able to ask myself how my lesson contributes to students successfully achieving the objective.

To me, the lesson goals help place a particular lesson into the overall scope of the course. If I cannot justify it in the larger picture, perhaps the lesson is missing the mark.

Gain attention and tap into prior knowledge/Interest Approach/Hook/Anticipatory Set
I like starting class with some sort of warm-up activity. This allows the students to shift from whatever was happening before class to a learning mind-set. Beyond the first day of class, I like to use this opportunity to ask the types of questions I would use on an exam. This serves two purposes: 1) Students can anticipate what my exam will be like and 2) I can gauge how well students are grasping the material. However, on the first day of class I used the warm-up as a precursor to our class introductions. By creating “business cards”, not only did I get to know the students faster, I had flashcards to study the student’s names! Additionally, this pulls from student’s prior knowledge of jobs available to them, although I hope to expend on this throughout the semester as well.

Input/teaching/Summary of Teaching Methods
This section was initially hard for me to design. I had tried to follow Dr. Foster’s formatting of a lesson plan, but I found that his style was too hard for me to follow. Therefore, I created my own table layout. There are three columns to my table: time, activity and description/instructions. The description/instruction column is detailed enough for a colleague to follow, but leaves enough room for interpretation as well.

Within my lesson plan, I tried to mix-up who was doing the talking; typically every-other activity switches the attention from students to instructor. Also, I was sure to change up the way information was being conveyed (e.g. PowerPoint, unsupported lecture, discussion).

In this particular lesson, introductions and review of the syllabus are necessary first day activities. I only see these students 15 times; so, I believe it is important for me to get to know the students quickly and for them to get to know me as an instructor. Also, it is important I lay the framework of the course through the syllabus to set the tone for the rest of the semester. I prefer taking the time to set the framework for the semester, rather than jumping right into lecture materials on the first day of class.

Since this course is partly discussion based, covering potentially controversial topics, I like the triangle activity because it is a low risk situation for students to put out their thoughts to the entire classroom. In addition, it’s fun (with a purpose of course!).

Lastly, I expect students to write well for this course; therefore, I attempt to set them up for success by conveying these expectations. Previously, students have had difficulty structuring their arguments; so, I review a basic 5-paragraph essay with the idea of including a claim, data to support the claim, and a warrant to connect the data to the claim. We then look at examples written by a variety of authors based on topics related to the environment. These essays are available online through NPR’s This I Believe website.

Application/Guided practice with feedback
This activity (This I Believe) was given a longer timeframe than most other sections of the lesson plan. However, because the guided practice was based on 4 different scenarios (and the relative importance of grasping this topic), I was ok with this. In my mind, the 60 minutes was divided into smaller activities, which did not make a 60 minute chunk of time seem as if it lasted forever.

Independent practice/assessment (ex. Homework)
Homework in this course is primarily essay based, which is why I tried to lay out my expectations for writing during the first week. I expect that students will apply what we talked about (claim, data, warrant) as they write their opinions of chapters read from their text. Not only does this show me that they comprehend what is going on, but I realize not everyone is keen on class discussions. Short papers allow for me to know what the student is thinking and engage in another forum.

Closure Wrap Up/Cognitive Connect/Show what you know in class!
To me, this is a time for me to emphasize take-home messages and give reminder announcements. I know that my class is not the only class students have on their plate so I try to take the time to summarize the day’s class.


Overall, I was please how the first day of class went. I wish I had had this lesson plan at the time, but I look forward to having them in the future.

What is the "Entomologist's Hat"?

“The second someone find out you took an insect course, you automatically wear the entomologist’s hat.”

These words have been repeated to me countless times as I have taken and been the TA for a freshwater entomology course at Penn State. Even on the first day of the course, the instructor forewarns the students that family and friends alike will expect the students to know every insect they encounter for the rest of their life. Not only is this physically impossible, but our fifteen week course is restricted to larval aquatic insects which makes up such a small proportion of the globe’s insect fauna. Regardless, this is what he refers to as the “entomologist’s hat.” So weather you wear multiple hats or have a cap with lots of feathers in it, join in the conversation.

What are your hats?

Syllabus: A Critical Review

The syllabus I chose to use for this assignment is the syllabus I created for FOR242: Elements of Project Supervision in Forestry. The title of the course is highly misleading; however, this is out of my control. If I were to change the title, I would change it to: Wildlife Policy and Current Events.

My syllabus underwent several changes from last year (Spring 2015) prior to the beginning of the Spring 2016 semester. This primarily included formatting of headers and organization of information. Although minute, I changed the font to match that which I require under my formatting policy. I chose to lead by example. Other major changes included an updated office on Dubois campus, discrete office hours (now that I have an office at Penn State Dubois) and the elimination of my cell phone number (I did have students text me questions instead of email me). Therefore, on my latest syllabus, I indicated that email is my preferred method of communication.

At the beginning of this semester, I chose to eliminate last year’s objectives because they were poorly written and include a course overview instead. On my latest syllabus, I have rephrased the course overview and reinforced the major objectives of my course. I believe that the focus and direction of the course is clearer not only to myself but my students as well. Additionally, I have several updated policies:

1. Attendance - This year I added attendance to the grading scheme in hopes that students might be less inclined to schedule meetings with other professors or interviews during my class. While I understand that life happens, it is discouraging to see the lack of value students put on my class. After a discussion with Dr. Cindy Raynak, she suggested changing “Attendance” to “Participation”. My initial policy indicated as long as students were physically in a chair, they would receive a point and students will do anything for a point. To encourage more participation, I should call it just that.

2. Cell phones and Other Electronics - Last year I did not even think to have this policy, but it quickly became clear that I needed one. I struggled with the language I wanted to use, but I needed students to see how serious I am about the policy.

3. Examinations - Somehow I missed including this policy in 2015 and at the beginning of 2016. However, I wrote a short statement to cover the single exam I have in this course. It was difficult to find examples of this policy online as a basis for my own. However, I think this covers what I need.

4. Formatting - Last year I received a barrage of formats for writing assignments. This year, I included a policy for consistency as well as a sense of professionalism.

5. Late Assignments - Last year I did not have a late assignment policy which came back to bite me. Therefore, I was sure to include it this year. This policy was based off of a policy from an instructor who I respect and whose teaching style I try to incorporate into my own.

Another change that I made, per the suggestion of Dr. Raynak, is putting my “Grading” and “Points” sections together. This way, students have all of the information they need in once place. In addition, Dr. Raynak suggested including the point values for the ranges of each grade. This way, students do not have to do the math to see what grade they are getting. Her point was that students should work on the course materials instead of working on the syllabus to see what grade they will receive. With some thought, I finally agreed with this scenario and added the point values under “Grading”.

Another change that I made this year was related to the “Course Schedule” section of the syllabus. The change I decided to make was to include the Taking Sides Topics in the syllabus instead of another document as I did last year. Students had to use too many resources to figure out what chapter they were to read for class. Additionally, I included the corresponding chapters to help alleviate confusion.

Overall, I have become much more confident with my syllabus and my course as a whole. Being able to clearly communicate my goals and expectations to the class will help their performance as well as enhance my overall delivery of the course.