Insect behavior is a curious thing. Those that are terrestrial are easily observed by the average person such as ants on the ground, bees buzzing around flowers, crickets chirping at night or the pesky house fly sitting on the window. However, there are many insects whose behaviors go unnoticed. One such group of insects is a group that lives in water also referred to as aquatic macroinvertebrates.
Aquatic macroinvertebrates exhibit a behavior called drift. A scientist by the name of Mueller (no known relation but I am looking into it) described a phenomenon where some, not all, species of macroinvertebrates release themselves from the substrate and float downstream in the current until they choose to grab ahold again. The macroinvertebrates continue this process of moving farther and farther downstream until they emerge and the adult fly upstream to lay their eggs. Once the eggs hatch the process of drifting repeats itself. Without going into further detail of when, why, types and other patterns, simply put there is still limited knowledge about this behavior.
An increasing number of studies have been done to look at various factors influencing insect drift. One particular study looked at the impact of suspended solids (sediment) on macroinvertebrates drift behavior in an Indiana Creek (USA). Sediment is considered a pollutant, which comes from activities such as mining, farming, and logging. Previous studies have shown that when there has been an observed increase in sediment in water there has been an observed decrease in macroinvertebrate numbers because sediment decreases the amount of light that comes through the water column as well as smothers habitat. This particular study wanted to consider the impact of sediment runoff of a rock quarry. In this study, controlled amounts of sediment (collected from the bottom of the quarry’s settling ponds) were released into the stream from a modified garbage can dispenser. Holes in the bottom of the can allowed water to flow through the garbage can and a known amount of sediment was placed inside therefore they could calculate the total suspended solids released.
Collecting drifting macroinvertebrates is done by using an appropriately named drift net. These nets were placed in the water downstream of the garbage can for 15 minutes during the time the sediment was being added. After 15 minutes, nets were removed from the water and the insects and debris captured were preserved in 70% ethanol. In the laboratory, macroinvertebrates were identified and counted. Water samples were also taken to be checked in the laboratory for the total suspended solids in order to compare the numbers to what was being released. The researchers were responsible and stopped the experiment on a particular day when they noticed sediment starting to collect on rocks in the study site. Lastly, a substrate sample was also taken, on non-experiment days, with a Surber sampler to determine what the natural benthic macroinvertebrate community structure was.
The results of this study were not particularly surprising. There was a linear relationship between the number of macroinvertebrates drifting and the amount of sediment put into the stream. They found that midge, blackfly, caddisfly, and mayfly larvae were the most common drifting species. Riffle beetles were observed in the substrate but did drift and were therefore not as effected by the sediment entering the water. The researchers cannot be sure, but they believe this drifting behavior could be classified as active-behavioral drift. This means that the macroinvertebrates chose to move away from something happening in their environment as opposed to being carried away by a high flow after a heavy rain. Based on their observations, short term re-population of the study area was successful but high levels of suspended solids could be detrimental in the long term.
So even though an impact like dumping sediment into a stream is a pretty drastic situation, it can have further implications on an ecosystem than just making some insects change habitat. Fish rely on macroinvertebrates as a food source. No macroinvertebrates will mean no fish. Therefore, it is critical that more studies like this one occur to find our what human activities have what level of effect on macroinvertebrate behaviors. The same applies for the dumping of chemicals or excess water into streams. What are the part per million or part per billion tolerances of macroinvertebrates? How tightly can they hang onto the substrate when there is an increased flow? There is also limited knowledge of the time scales of which these changes in macroinvertebrate behaviors occur. Therefore, as more an more industry waste is created it is important to remember the little guys even if we don't see them every day.
To see the original paper visit: https://journals.iupui.edu/index.php/ias/article/viewFile/8310/8461
To read more about the original research on drift, locate the paper:
Müller, K. 1954. Investigations on the organic drift in North Swedish streams. Rep. Inst. Freshw. Res. Drottning. 35:133-148.
Do you know if there is any correlation between drifting and the speed of the water flow in a stream? what i mean to say is will they still attempt to "Drift" even if there is little to no water flow?
ReplyDeleteHi Chris,
DeleteI did a quick Google Scholar search because I have not come across any literature about it before, but it does exists (type in Macroinvertebrate drift flow). Unfortunately I was unable to access the PDFs because I would have had to pay for them. Based on what I have read I think that drift is a method of dispersing young to decrease resource competition. At the same time, not all species exhibit this sort of behavior so it may have something to do with niche fulfillment. I imagine that drifting in low flow would be difficult if there was enough water loss to be looking at at only a couple inches of water. In talking about a system that is several meters deep, perhaps not. Other variables may come into play such as will a low flow change fish foraging behaviors (either becoming more concentrated or will they move to another part of the channel) therefore causing macroinvertebrates to "care less" or drift more in each respective situation. Either way, I believe that it is still a complex behavior we as scientists still have a lot to learn about!
The first paper on that search is freely available, just look at the far right-hand side of scholar next to the title of the paper for the link to the PDF which is http://www.fishsciences.net/reports/Reg_Rivers-Riv_Res_Apps/River_Res_Applic_%282007%29_Effect_exp_flow_reduct_macroinv_drift.pdf
DeleteYou can also access many of these papers through the library website data bases e.g. Wiley Online Library, Web of Knowledge etc.
Your post was written really well (try and say that fast!).
Thanks Ross! I must have not been logged into the appropriate network. I'll have to take a look again later.
DeleteThat was very interesting! So does this mean the drifting behavior in macroinvertebrates will only occur if they are in an area that is not suitable for them? Or will this behavior continue anyways because it seems like they use it to reach their mating area.
ReplyDeleteHi Julia and thank you for your question. Drifting is a complex behavior that has a lot to be discovered about it. My understanding is that drifting occurs in some species but not all. Perhaps it would be more accurate to say some genera drift, but not all because there really is variation within families and orders as to whether or not an insect drifts. Because of that, my thought is that drift has to do with filling a niche and some insects are therefore predisposed to being a drifter. I do not know the answer about having to reach a mating site, though that could be an interesting theory.
ReplyDeleteAny idea on tolerance levels of drifting in regards to high water flow? It must exert a lot of force on their little limbs to grab back onto a rock against the current.
ReplyDeleteAquatic macroinvertebrates exhibit at least two types of drift (behavioral and environmental) and I feel as if there is a third, but I can't think of it off the top of my head. Behavioral is the active "decision" to release from the substrate. Environmental drift is passive in the sense that insects are forced to release from the substrate because of event such as a flood. However, aquatic macroinvertebrates have developed adaptations to stay in one place if they want to. Think of caddisflies and their ability to secrete a substance to bind rocks together or nets to rocks. As far as I know, most cased caddises are not considered drifters in either the behavioral or environmental sense.
DeleteFascinating. So would you say this choice of behaviour is an inherited one, or one learned by an individual and evolved more than once? Possibly a bit hard to tell for invertebrates, maybe. I couldn't agree more - so often aquatic invertebrates are overlooked or forgotten(guilty as charged). Looking forward to filling in the serious gaps in my knowledge about aquatic invertebrates with more of the same.
ReplyDeleteBy the way, I notice your background picture does travel as the page scrolls down, as I specifically made sure mine was set to do, but isn't doing. Do you know your secret?
I have no clue as the the inheritability of this behavior. In my mind, it is like asking how do cased caddisflies know which materials to use to build their cases with since they are generally species specific? Trial and error and we only see the ones who do? The only way I can think to measure this is to understand the natural populations and then place an individual into an artificial stream. However, that scenario just doesn't seem very practical to me. And in reality, does it matter that we understand this or is does it matter if we understand the why and not the "how"? Maybe if a drifting population crashed and a drifting species was reintroduced...would they be successful? I'm interested in hearing what you think...!
DeleteI think the fact that aquatic macroinvertebrates get so overlooked is why I find them so fascinating. I also have no clue about my blog background....magic!
Well in my mind it is a 'why' question rather than a 'how', as 'why do they show this behaviour?' can be answered with 'because it's inherited', from which you can then follow with questions of why it continues to be inherited (eg continuing sediment). So yeah, good point, if sediment is having an adverse effect then invertebrates that didn't drift would quickly be taken care of. Which seems a bit obvious in retrospect! Now to get my blog picture to drift...
ReplyDelete